Electric Grid Security Fears After Leaked Memo's Surface

""A leaked internal memorandum from the company running the electrical transformers near San Jose, California, that were attacked by snipers in April 2013 admits it is “years away” from promised upgrades, raising serious concerns about the security of other critical electrical transformers nationwide, according to a new report in Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.

Publicly, Pacific Gas and Electric Corporation has been attempting to build confidence in its commitment to increase security following the attack on the Metcalf Transmission Substation by gunman using AK-47s, which caused $15 million worth of damage to 17 transformers.

The promise of upgrading security at the facility came after the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered utilities nationwide to enact standards to protect vulnerable bulk-power systems.

As WND reported, under the FERC order, the facilities must take at least three steps to provide physical security. Owners and operators are required to perform a risk assessment of their systems to identify facilities which, if damaged or inoperable, could have a broad, critical impact. Security plans must then be developed to address potential threats and vulnerabilities.

Soon after the 2013 incident, WND reported the Department of Homeland Security, nevertheless, decided to cut back on training to help electric utilities harden their facilities.

DHS is charged with protecting the country’s critical infrastructures, including the national electric grid system, which would be dramatically affected by either a natural or high-altitude nuclear explosion unleashing an electromagnetic pulse.

Get the rest of this report, and others, at Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.

The internal PG&E memo, dated Aug. 30, 2014, leaked to a local television station revealed that despite publicly claiming it has spent millions of dollars on security upgrades at the Metcalf facility, the company was still years away from physically securing its electrical substations.

The memo said on Aug. 27, 2014, there was another early morning intrusion by unknown assailants who entered the general construction yard and then the substation at Metcalf.

Despite triggering alarms and the presence of two onsite security officers, the intruders were able to steal “several substantial pieces of equipment.”

The memo from Stephanie Douglas, senior director of corporate security, to the company’s president, Chris Johns, revealed that security upgrades have remained “unchanged.” It said those are “years away.”""

Click Here for More:

http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/leaked-memo-raises-electric-grid-security-fears/

California Fault Line Fears for 2015 as Earthquake and Tsunami Threat Now Elevated

""The earthquake fault cuts through the heart of Ventura's quaint downtown, past the ornate hilltop City Hall and historic Spanish-era mission before heading into the Pacific Ocean.

For decades, some seismic experts believed the Ventura fault posed only a moderate threat and was incapable of producing a major temblor.

But research in recent years shows that the fault is extremely dangerous, capable of producing an earthquake as large as magnitude 8 as well as severe tsunamis that until now experts didn't believe were possible from a Southern California quake.

Such a big earthquake on the fault estimated to occur every 400 to 2,400 years, experts said. The last sizable quake on the Ventura area hit about 800 years ago. Large temblors occur on this fault less frequently than on the San Andreas fault, which has long been considered the state's most dangerous.

 Ventura-Pitas Point fault
The California Geological Survey is studying whether it needs to revise tsunami hazard maps because of the researchers' findings. One study found that the inundation would be "severe right along the coast" but didn't call for redrawing evacuation zones farther inland.

"We're not done looking at it," said Rick Wilson, a California Geological Survey senior engineering geologist. "If new information comes forward, we'll change the lines to make sure the communities are as safe as possible."

Scientists have long known the San Andreas fault was capable of producing an 8.0 quake. But because that fault is so far inland in Southern California, the San Andreas does not pose a tsunami risk. The worst tsunami risk comes from a mega-quake from Alaska, which would give Californians hours of time to evacuate.

A huge quake on the Ventura fault could create a tsunami that would begin "in the Santa Barbara Channel area, and would affect the coastline … of Santa Barbara, Carpinteria, down through the Santa Monica area and further south," said Tom Jordan, director of the Southern California Earthquake Center and USC earth sciences professor, who was not involved in the research.

Scientists from Harvard University, USC, the U.S. Geological Survey and San Diego State used underground oil data, cutting-edge earth imaging and research on ancient beach mapping to form their conclusions, which were published last year in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

One key finding is that the fault now appears to be connected to a network of others that stretch from the Santa Barbara coast and into eastern Ventura County.

A major earthquake on the Ventura fault could then cause shaking along nearby faults to the east, along the foothill suburbs of Los Angeles and San Bernardino counties.

Such a worst-case scenario would mean a 7.7 to 8.1 earthquake ripping from Ventura underneath the San Fernando Valley, Altadena, Azusa and east through to Rancho Cucamonga in San Bernardino County.

"The Ventura fault goes right through downtown Ventura, so … clearly there would be a lot of damage," Jordan said. "But the shaking of an event of this magnitude would affect an area for hundreds of kilometers around it. So it's not just right there in Ventura — it's the whole, effectively, coastal Southern California from Santa Barbara to L.A."

U.S. Geological Survey geophysicist Ken Hudnut, who is also not affiliated with the study, said the findings have changed how scientists view how dangerous this fault is.

"People should stand up and take notice," Hudnut said. "It used to be nobody would've ever claimed magnitudes of earthquakes along this fault system that were in that size range."


Finding more about the Ventura fault took on new urgency after the destructive 2011 Japan earthquake and tsunami. Experts had not foreseen a magnitude 9 earthquake occurring where it did.

As a result, Hudnut said, scientists in Southern California began asking themselves, "What are the big things we're missing?"

That earthquake "informed all of us that, basically, we should really question our assumptions more," he added. "We know it in our minds as scientists that events could occur that are sort of off the charts and blow away all of our prior assumptions — and usually that's because we never saw anything like that happen in historical time."

The first clue to exceptionally large earthquakes on the Ventura fault came from observations of old sections of shoreline west of Ventura. The Pitas Point and Punta Gorda areas were "yanked out of the surf zone by large uplift events," growing between 16 feet to 26 feet suddenly, said San Diego State geology professor Thomas Rockwell.

People should stand up and take notice. It used to be nobody would've ever claimed magnitudes of earthquakes along this fault system that were in that size range.
- Ken Hudnut, U.S. Geological Survey geophysicist
Such huge movements of earth — as high as a freeway overpass — could be explained only by a mega-quake. "You need really large faults to get large earthquakes," Rockwell said.

But it wasn't immediately obvious what fault could produce it, because there weren't any obvious big faults nearby.

So to better understand what was going on, scientists created an image of the underground Ventura fault, based on old oil well data and an imaging technique known as seismic reflection.

Scientists discovered two key things. First, the fault extends much deeper than some originally thought, said the study's lead author, Judith Hubbard, who worked on this study as she obtained a geology doctorate at Harvard.

Second, at that depth, the Ventura fault could connect with other faults, and they could join together to create a mega-earthquake.

"The only way you can get such large earthquakes on the Ventura-Pitas Point faults is to have it rupture simultaneously, with mechanically interlinked faults to the east or the west," said USC earth sciences professor James Dolan, a coauthor of the study.

To get a 7.7 to 8.1 earthquake, several connected faults including the Ventura would need to slip at the same time, potentially including such faults as the Santa Susana, which runs along the western part of the San Fernando Valley, and even the Sierra Madre fault zones, which extend along the foothill suburbs such as Altadena, Azusa and Fontana.

Such an earthquake along this fault system would produce 32 to 126 times more energy than the 1994 Northridge earthquake, which was a magnitude 6.7.""

http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-ventura-fault-20150420-story.html#page=1