The Pillar of Obamacare is to Control ALL Health Care Decisions: The Death Panel Conspiracy is Real and all Coverage and Care Plans are Run by the FED

""During the debates surrounding the Affordable Care Act in 2009 and 2010, before it was passed into law without a single Republican vote, many critics who actually had read the lengthy bill, unlike a number of lawmakers, noticed a provision that established so-called "death panels," committees of federal bureaucrats who essentially decide whether or not older Americans would have access to end-of-life care.

One of the most vocal opponents was former Alaska governor and 2008 vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, who warned that the Obamacare provisions that encouraged doctors to provide "voluntary" end-of-life counseling and planning could quickly turn into federal mandates – mandates that may eventually lead to benefit cuts as bureaucrats decided that spending scarce tax dollars on the elderly was not efficient.
Well, those provisions have quietly been resurrected by the Obama administration and, according to the Associated Press, they could take effect by January 1.

The paper noted:

Six years after end-of-life planning nearly derailed development of the Affordable Care Act amid charges of "death panels," the Obama administration has revived a proposal to reimburse physicians for talking with their Medicare patients about how patients want to be cared for as they near death.

The proposal, contained in a large set of Medicare regulations unveiled Wednesday, comes amid growing public discussion about the need for medical care that better reflects patients' wishes as they get older.

But it's not just the Obama administration advocating for this. A couple of months ago, GOP presidential contender and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush recommended essentially the same thing. He suggested that Medicare patients should sign an advanced directive spelling out the level of care they wanted should they someday become incapacitated.

Find out more about Obamacare's death panels by clicking here to search GoodGopher.com!

Big Brother wants to control ALL health care decisions

Public policy wonks and some lawmakers noted that before Palin made such a big deal of the so-called panels, there was bipartisan support for end-of-life counseling. And now, some believe that the controversy has ended, as well as the stigma Palin associated with the counseling.

"I think society's going to get over it this time and see the good in it," Dr. Joe Rotella, chief medical officer of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, told theAssociated Press. "It's really about living in the way that means the most to you to the last moments of your life."

All of that may very well be true, but Palin's assertion, and the assertion of others – that an authoritarian government could, at some point in the future, use today's consultation process as springboard to restricting benefits in the future – is entirely plausible.

For confirmation, consider what is taking place in Great Britain, where officials have, for years, limited benefit payments from the country's universal National Health Service because funds are tight and needs are great, resulting in health care rationing.

Push for more health care control in D.C.

As reported by PRI in 2010:

Today, 95 percent of Britons get their care through the government-run program. In order to provide care to everyone, the government says it must place limits on the care it provides. It must ration.

"We have a limited budget for health care, voted by Parliament every year, and we have to live within our means," said Michael Rawlins, chairman of a government agency called the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).

There are American advocates for rationing, as well. Peter Singer, a professor of bioethics at Princeton University, wrote a lengthy piece for The New York Times (see here) stressing that Americans should also be subject to healthcare rationing (even if they can pay for procedures themselves). ""

http://www.naturalnews.com/050503_death_panels_conspiracy_Obamacare.html

Interesting Thought Experiment: FED Reserve Wolf, Hides Out in Sheep's Clothing. The Deficit Has Always Been Fake

It seems a petite, very small tax of 0.1 cents on each dollar processed thru Federal Reserve Bank daily would cover the whole budget of the United States of 3.5 trillion a year.

Math proof (please check)  follows.

Please assume a $1 tax on 1000 dollars.

14 trillion divided by $1000 = 14 billion a day

14 billion times 5 days a week = 70 billion

70 billion times 52 weeks = 3 trillion 640 billion a year ~ yearly federal budget

Now that works if my math on $1 on each $1000 is correct.

One dollar is 100 cents.  One thousand dollars is 10000 cents therefore

the financial transaction tax is 0.1 cent per each dollar.

The Federal Reserve Bank processes all retail, all goods and services, stocks, bonds, every transaction that goes thru banks.

I am not an economist so this seems so easy to me that I must be making some horrible calculations here or there is some "moral hazard" with taxing the Federal Reserve to pay for the Federal Government, or there is some "funny money" all mixed in with the balance sheets of the Federal Reserve that makes this proposal not a viable way to pay for our debts.

Please Do Check Out the Comment Section:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/01/10/1356889/-Federal-Reserve-processes-financial-transactions-of-14-trillion-daily

Foreigners Dump $74 Billion In Treasurys In 6 Consecutive Weeks: Biggest Sequential Outflow In History

""Over the weekend, we observed the perplexing sell off of $56 billion in US Treasurys courtesy of weekly disclosure in the Fed's custodial account (source: H.4.1) and speculated if this may be due to an asset rotation, under duress or otherwise, out of bonds and into stocks, to prevent the collapse of the global ponzi (because when the BRICs tell the IMF to boost its bailout capacity you know it is global). We also proposed a far simpler theory: "the dreaded D-day in which foreign official and private investors finally start offloading their $2.7 trillion in Treasurys with impunity (although not with the element of surprise - China has made it abundantly clear it will sell its Treasury holdings, the only question is when), has finally arrived." In hindsight the Occam's Razor should have been applied. Little did we know 5 short days ago just how violent the reaction by China would be (both post and pre-facto) to the Senate decision to propose a law for all out trade warfare with China. Now we know - in the week ended October 12, a further $17.7 billion was "removed" from the Fed's custodial Treasury account, meaning that someone, somewhere is very displeased with US paper, and, far more importantly, what it represents, and wants to make their displeasure heard loud and clear.""

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/foreigners-dump-74-billion-treasurys-6-consecutive-weeks-biggest-sequential-outflow-history